Orthopedic Billing Services: Global Period Traps, Surgical Bundling Rules, and the Modifier Errors That Cost Practices Thousands
By Medtransic | February 15, 2026 | 17 min read | Updated: February 15, 2026
Quick Summary: Orthopedic billing spans surgical procedures, fracture care, joint injections, implant pass-throughs, and post-operative management — each governed by global period rules, NCCI bundling edits, and laterality modifiers that general billing companies consistently get wrong. The result is an estimated 7 to 12 percent of annual revenue lost to preventable coding errors.
At Medtransic, orthopedic billing is the specialty where surgical complexity meets the most rigid billing rules in medicine. Every major orthopedic surgery — joint replacements, spinal fusions, ACL reconstructions, rotator cuff repairs — carries a 90-day global period that bundles all pre-operative and post-operative care into a single payment. Bill a post-op visit separately during that window and the claim is denied. Miss a billable service that falls outside the global package and the revenue is gone.
But the global period is only one layer. Orthopedic practices also navigate laterality modifiers on every bilateral procedure, NCCI bundling edits that change which arthroscopic codes can be billed together, implant pass-through reimbursement that varies by facility type, and workers compensation claims that operate under entirely different fee schedules and authorization rules than commercial insurance. A general billing company treating orthopedic claims like primary care E/M visits will leave 7 to 12 percent of your annual revenue on the table.
This guide covers the coding rules, global period logic, modifier requirements, and payer-specific traps that define orthopedic medical billing — and what your billing company should be doing to capture every dollar your practice earns.
Why Orthopedic Billing Overwhelms General Billing Companies
Orthopedic practices generate revenue across a wider range of service types than almost any other specialty. A single practice may perform high-volume office visits and injections, outpatient arthroscopic procedures, major inpatient surgeries, post-operative rehabilitation management, DME prescriptions, and imaging interpretation — each with different coding rules, different payer requirements, and different reimbursement structures.
The fundamental challenge is that orthopedic surgery billing is built on the global surgical package — a concept that does not exist in most other specialties. When a surgeon performs a total knee replacement (CPT 27447), the reimbursement covers the surgery itself, one day of pre-operative care, and 90 days of post-operative follow-up visits. Every service during that 90-day window must be evaluated against the global package: is it included (not separately billable), or does it qualify for separate billing with the correct modifier? Getting this wrong in either direction — billing for included services or failing to bill for excluded services — costs practices thousands per surgeon per year.
Medtransic assigns dedicated orthopedic billing specialists to every musculoskeletal practice we serve because this specialty cannot be handled by generalists. Our orthopedic coding team reads operative reports, tracks global periods by patient, and applies modifier logic that reflects both CMS rules and payer-specific variations.
Orthopedic Surgery CPT Codes That Drive Revenue
Orthopedic CPT codes span the entire 20000-29999 musculoskeletal range plus evaluation and management, radiology, and medicine codes. The highest-revenue procedures require the most precise coding. For a broader reference, see our CPT codes cheat sheet.
Joint Replacement and Reconstruction
| CPT Code | Description | Global Period | Key Billing Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27447 | Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) | 90 days | One of the highest-volume orthopedic surgeries. Includes all routine post-op visits for 90 days. Prior authorization required by nearly all payers. Implant costs billed separately in ASC settings. |
| 27130 | Total hip arthroplasty (THA) | 90 days | Same global period rules as TKA. Document laterality (RT/LT) — bilateral staged procedures use modifier -58 for the second side. |
| 27486 | Revision total knee arthroplasty | 90 days | Higher reimbursement than primary TKA. Requires documentation of the specific components revised and the clinical indication for revision. |
| 27134 | Revision total hip arthroplasty (both components) | 90 days | Distinguish between revision of acetabular component only (27137), femoral component only (27138), or both (27134). Incorrect component selection is a common coding error. |
| 29827 | Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair | 90 days | Do NOT confuse with 23412 (open rotator cuff repair). The operative report must specify arthroscopic approach — billing 23412 for an arthroscopic procedure triggers immediate denial. |
Arthroscopy
| CPT Code | Description | Key Billing Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 29881 | Knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy (medial OR lateral) | If both medial and lateral meniscectomy performed, bill 29880 (which includes both compartments). Do NOT bill 29881 twice — this is an unbundling error. |
| 29880 | Knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy (medial AND lateral) | Includes both compartments. Higher reimbursement than 29881. Requires operative report documenting work in both compartments. |
| 29882 | Knee arthroscopy with meniscus repair (medial OR lateral) | Repair codes reimburse higher than meniscectomy codes. Documentation must specify repair technique (suture, anchor, etc.). |
| 29826 | Shoulder arthroscopy with acromioplasty | Commonly performed with rotator cuff repair. When performed with 29827, check NCCI edits — acromioplasty may bundle into rotator cuff repair depending on payer. |
| 29823 | Shoulder arthroscopy with extensive debridement | Bundles into most other shoulder arthroscopy codes. Only separately billable when performed as the sole procedure or with modifier -59/XS documentation. |
Spine Surgery
| CPT Code | Description | Key Billing Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 22551 | Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), single level | 90-day global. Additional levels billed with add-on code 22552. Document exact vertebral levels — vague documentation like "cervical spine" is insufficient. |
| 22612 | Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), single level | 90-day global. Additional levels use add-on 22614. Instrumentation (22840-22848) billed separately. Each component requires documentation. |
| 22630 | Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), single level | Different approach than 22612. Code selection depends on surgical approach documented in the operative report. |
| 63030 | Lumbar laminotomy/discectomy, single level | 90-day global. Additional levels use add-on 63035. One of the most common spine procedures — often under-coded when multiple levels are addressed. |
Spine surgery coding is among the most complex in all of medicine — sharing many of the same spinal procedure coding challenges encountered in pain management billing. A single posterior lumbar fusion may involve the fusion code (22612), instrumentation codes (22840-22848), bone graft codes (20930-20938), and intervertebral device codes (22853-22859) — each billed separately with specific documentation requirements. Missing any component is leaving revenue on the table. Billing an incorrect combination triggers bundling denials. Medtransic's spine coding specialists review every operative report against the full code family to ensure complete and compliant charge capture.
The Global Period: The Most Misunderstood Rule in Orthopedic Billing
The global surgical period is the single most important concept in orthopedic billing. Every major orthopedic surgery carries a global period during which pre-operative and post-operative services are bundled into the surgical fee. Understanding what is included versus what can be billed separately during the global window is the difference between accurate billing and systemic revenue loss.
Global Period Categories
| Global Period | What It Covers | Common Orthopedic Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 0-day | Only the procedure itself on the day of surgery. No pre-op or post-op bundling. | Joint injections (20610), simple biopsies, minor wound care |
| 10-day | Day of surgery plus 10 days of post-operative care. No pre-op day included. | Trigger finger release (26055), ganglion cyst excision (25111), some tendon repairs |
| 90-day | One day pre-op + day of surgery + 90 days post-op (92 total days). All routine follow-up visits are bundled. | Total joint replacements (27447, 27130), ACL reconstruction (29888), rotator cuff repair (29827), spinal fusions (22612) |
What IS Included in the Global Period (Not Separately Billable)
What IS NOT Included (Can Be Billed Separately With Correct Modifier)
Fracture Care Billing: Open vs. Closed, Initial vs. Subsequent
Fracture care is one of the highest-volume revenue streams for orthopedic practices and one of the most error-prone areas of orthopedic medical billing. The coding depends on three variables that must all be documented and selected correctly: fracture type (open vs. closed), treatment type (with or without manipulation), and treatment setting (initial vs. subsequent encounter).
Fracture Treatment Code Logic
| Treatment Type | Description | Code Selection Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Closed treatment without manipulation | Fracture is treated without surgery and without manual realignment (e.g., splint or cast applied to a non-displaced fracture) | Lowest reimbursement tier. 10-day global period. Example: 25560 (closed treatment of radial/ulnar shaft fracture without manipulation) |
| Closed treatment with manipulation | Fracture is manually reduced (realigned) without surgical incision | Higher reimbursement. 90-day global period. Requires documentation of the manipulation performed. Example: 25565 (closed treatment of radial/ulnar shaft fracture with manipulation) |
| Open treatment (ORIF) | Surgical incision with internal fixation (plates, screws, rods) | Highest reimbursement. 90-day global period. Requires operative report documenting approach, fixation hardware, and fluoroscopy use. Example: 25574 (open treatment of radial/ulnar shaft fracture) |
| Percutaneous fixation | Fixation applied through skin punctures without open incision | Reimbursement between closed manipulation and ORIF. Must document percutaneous approach specifically — do not default to open treatment code. |
The ICD-10 coding for fractures adds another layer of complexity. Each fracture code requires a 7th character indicating encounter type: A (initial encounter), D (subsequent encounter for routine healing), G (subsequent encounter for delayed healing), K (subsequent encounter for nonunion), P (subsequent encounter for malunion), and S (sequela). Using the wrong 7th character — particularly billing an initial encounter code on a follow-up visit — triggers denials and audit flags. Medtransic's claim submission process validates the 7th character against the encounter type on every fracture claim.
Joint Injection Coding: Guided vs. Unguided and the Bundling Traps
Joint and soft tissue injections are among the most frequently performed — and most frequently miscoded — orthopedic procedures. The coding depends on the joint size, whether imaging guidance was used, and whether the injection was performed on the same day as an E/M service.
| CPT Code | Description | Key Billing Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 20610 | Arthrocentesis/injection of major joint (knee, shoulder, hip) WITHOUT imaging guidance | Most commonly billed injection code. 0-day global period. Can be billed same-day with E/M using modifier -25 on the E/M code. |
| 20611 | Arthrocentesis/injection of major joint WITH ultrasound guidance | Higher reimbursement than 20610. Requires documentation of ultrasound use including image storage. Do NOT bill 76942 (ultrasound guidance) separately — it bundles into 20611. |
| 20604 | Arthrocentesis/injection of small joint (finger, toe) WITHOUT guidance | Lower reimbursement. Same billing rules as major joint codes. |
| 20605 | Arthrocentesis/injection of intermediate joint (wrist, elbow, ankle) WITHOUT guidance | Middle-tier reimbursement. Joint size classification must match anatomical documentation. |
| 20600-20606 | Small and intermediate joint injection WITH guidance variants | Same guidance bundling rules apply — imaging guidance codes do not bill separately. |
For practices performing high volumes of ultrasound-guided injections, the transition from 20610 to 20611 represents a significant revenue opportunity. Ultrasound-guided injections (20611) reimburse approximately 30-40% more than unguided injections (20610) and are increasingly considered the standard of care for accuracy. Practices that have invested in point-of-care ultrasound should ensure every guided injection is coded as 20611 — not 20610 with a separate 76942 (which bundles and is denied).
Implant and Device Billing: The Pass-Through Revenue Most Practices Miss
Orthopedic surgeries frequently involve high-cost implants — joint prostheses, spinal hardware, plates, screws, and fixation devices. How these implants are billed depends entirely on the setting where the surgery is performed, and getting this wrong is one of the largest revenue leaks in orthopedic billing.
| Setting | Implant Billing Rule | Revenue Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital outpatient (HOPD) | Implants are typically included in the facility APC payment. Hospital absorbs implant cost. | No separate implant charge for the surgeon's practice. Revenue impact is on the facility side. |
| Ambulatory surgery center (ASC) | High-cost implants may qualify for pass-through payment or separate device-intensive add-on. Billed using HCPCS Level II codes (C-codes). | Significant revenue opportunity. ASCs can receive separate implant reimbursement on top of the procedure payment for qualifying devices. |
| Office-based surgery | Implants and supplies billed separately using appropriate HCPCS codes. Practice bears the cost and collects reimbursement directly. | Practice must manage supply costs vs. reimbursement to maintain margin. Under-coding implants means absorbing costs without reimbursement. |
For orthopedic practices with ASC ownership or affiliation, implant pass-through billing is a major revenue driver that requires specialized billing knowledge. The practice must track which implants qualify for separate reimbursement under current CMS and commercial payer rules, bill the correct HCPCS codes with supporting documentation (invoice, manufacturer, device identifier), and reconcile implant costs against reimbursement to ensure the ASC is not losing money on high-cost devices. Medtransic's orthopedic billing team manages implant tracking and pass-through billing for ASC-affiliated practices.
Modifier Rules That Make or Break Orthopedic Claims
Orthopedic billing uses more modifiers more frequently than almost any other specialty. Between laterality, global period exceptions, multiple procedures, bilateral surgeries, and assistant surgeon requirements, nearly every orthopedic claim requires at least one modifier — and many require two or three. For a complete reference, see our medical billing modifiers guide.
| Modifier | When to Use | Common Mistake |
|---|---|---|
| -RT / -LT | Laterality — identifies right side or left side for any procedure performed on a paired structure | Omitting laterality on extremity procedures. Payers deny claims without -RT or -LT on applicable codes. Some payers also require -RT/-LT on imaging codes. |
| -50 | Bilateral procedure — same procedure performed on both sides during the same session | Mixing -50 with -RT/-LT on the same claim. Use one method consistently per payer: either one line with -50 or two lines with -RT and -LT. Mixing triggers denials. |
| -59 / -XS | Distinct procedural service — used to override NCCI bundling edits when procedures are truly separate | Using -59 as a blanket unbundling tool without documentation. CMS prefers the more specific X{E,S,P,U} modifiers. -XS (separate structure) is most common in orthopedics for procedures on different anatomical sites. |
| -78 | Unplanned return to the OR for a related procedure during the global period | Using -78 for planned staged procedures (which require -58). Modifier -78 is specifically for unplanned complications requiring a return to surgery. |
| -58 | Staged or planned subsequent procedure during the global period | Failing to use -58 for a planned second-side joint replacement. The second surgery IS separately billable but requires -58 to indicate it was planned. |
| -79 | Unrelated procedure during the global period | Not billing an unrelated surgery that occurs during another procedure's global period. Example: A patient 6 weeks post-TKA fractures their wrist — the wrist ORIF is fully billable with -79. |
| -24 | Unrelated E/M service during the global period | Not billing office visits for unrelated conditions during a surgical global period. If the visit is for a different body system or complaint, it IS billable with -24. |
| -80 | Assistant surgeon — another surgeon assists during the procedure | Billing assistant surgeon when the payer does not reimburse for assistants on that procedure. Check the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule indicator before billing. |
| -51 | Multiple procedures — second and subsequent procedures during the same session | Not applying -51 when required, or applying it to add-on codes (add-on codes are modifier -51 exempt and should not carry this modifier). |
| -22 | Increased procedural services — procedure significantly more complex than typical | Under-using -22 when documentation supports it. A revision arthroplasty with extensive scar tissue removal, abnormal anatomy, or intraoperative complications may qualify for -22 with 20-30% higher reimbursement. |
The -22 modifier is particularly under-utilized in orthopedic surgery. When a surgeon documents significantly increased complexity — revision cases with extensive adhesions, morbidly obese patients requiring modified approaches, intraoperative complications managed successfully — modifier -22 can increase reimbursement by 20 to 30%. But it requires a cover letter explaining the additional work, and not every payer honors it. Medtransic identifies -22 opportunities during operative report review and prepares the supporting documentation for submission.
The 7 Most Common Orthopedic Billing Denials (and How to Prevent Them)
Orthopedic claim denials follow predictable patterns. Here are the seven categories that account for the majority of lost revenue, and how Medtransic's denial management process prevents each one.
1. Services Billed During the Global Period Without Modifier
The most frequent orthopedic denial. A post-operative visit or procedure is billed during the 90-day global window without the appropriate modifier (-24, -58, -78, or -79) to indicate it falls outside the global package. Prevention: track every patient's active global periods and validate every claim against them before submission.
2. Prior Authorization Not Obtained for Surgery
Joint replacements, spinal fusions, arthroscopic procedures, and advanced imaging (MRI, CT) nearly always require prior authorization. Performing surgery without authorization results in complete claim denial. Prevention: initiate authorization requests immediately upon surgical scheduling and confirm approval before the procedure date.
3. Unbundling Errors on Arthroscopy Claims
Billing multiple arthroscopic procedure codes that NCCI edits consider bundled — such as diagnostic arthroscopy (29870) with a surgical arthroscopy, or separate debridement codes with a more comprehensive procedure. Prevention: validate every multi-code arthroscopy claim against current NCCI edits.
4. Laterality Modifier Missing
Claims for extremity procedures submitted without -RT or -LT modifier. Some payers also require laterality modifiers on diagnostic imaging codes. Prevention: enforce laterality documentation requirements at the point of charge capture and validate modifier presence before submission.
5. Open vs. Arthroscopic Code Mismatch
Billing an open procedure code (23412 — open rotator cuff repair) when the operative report documents an arthroscopic approach (29827 — arthroscopic rotator cuff repair), or vice versa. This creates a code-to-documentation mismatch that payers deny on audit. Prevention: compare the billed CPT code against the operative report's description of surgical approach on every surgical claim.
6. Fracture Care 7th Character Error
Using the initial encounter 7th character (A) on a follow-up fracture visit, or using the subsequent encounter character (D) on the first treatment. The ICD-10 7th character must match the encounter type documented in the chart. Prevention: verify encounter type alignment on every fracture claim.
7. Medical Necessity Documentation Insufficient
Payers deny surgical claims when the documentation does not establish that conservative treatment was attempted and failed before surgical intervention. Joint replacements typically require documented evidence of physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and injection therapy before surgery is authorized. Prevention: ensure the surgeon's documentation includes the conservative treatment history and Medtransic's verification team confirms medical necessity requirements by payer before scheduling.
Workers Compensation and Personal Injury: The Orthopedic Revenue Stream That Requires Different Billing
Orthopedic practices treat a significant volume of workers compensation and personal injury cases — often 15 to 30% of total patient volume. These cases operate under entirely different billing rules than commercial insurance and require specialized handling that general billing companies frequently lack.
| Factor | Commercial Insurance | Workers Compensation |
|---|---|---|
| Fee schedule | Negotiated contracted rates per payer | State-mandated fee schedule — rates are set by the state workers comp board and are often higher than commercial rates |
| Authorization | Prior auth through insurance company | Authorization through the employer's workers comp carrier or third-party administrator (TPA). Different process, different contacts, different timelines. |
| Billing form | CMS-1500 | Some states require specific workers comp billing forms or additional fields on CMS-1500 |
| Timely filing | Typically 90-365 days depending on payer | Varies by state — some states have shorter filing deadlines |
| Payment timeline | 14-45 days typical | Often 30-60+ days — requires aggressive follow-up |
| Appeals process | Through the insurance company | May involve the state workers comp board or dispute resolution process |
Personal injury and auto accident cases add another layer: billing against auto insurance policies, coordinating with attorneys on lien-based billing, and managing the extended timeline (some PI cases take 1-3 years to resolve). Medtransic's accounts receivable management includes dedicated workers compensation and personal injury follow-up workflows that account for the longer payment cycles and different authorization processes these cases require.
What to Demand From an Orthopedic Billing Company
Orthopedic billing demands capabilities that go far beyond standard revenue cycle management. When evaluating an orthopedic medical billing company, demand evidence of these specific competencies.
| Requirement | Why It Matters | What to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| Global period tracking by patient | Every major surgery creates a 90-day billing window with specific rules | How do you track active global periods? Do you flag encounters that qualify for separate billing during the global window? |
| Operative report review | Code selection must match the surgical approach, technique, and components documented | Who reviews operative reports — certified coders or general billers? How do you verify open vs. arthroscopic code selection? |
| NCCI bundling validation | Arthroscopy and multi-procedure claims are heavily subject to bundling edits | Do you validate every multi-code surgical claim against current NCCI edits before submission? |
| Implant and device billing | ASC-affiliated practices need pass-through reimbursement for high-cost implants | Do you manage implant pass-through billing? Do you track qualifying devices by HCPCS code? |
| Workers compensation handling | 15-30% of orthopedic volume may be workers comp with different rules | Do you have a separate workers comp billing workflow? Do you track state-specific fee schedules? |
| Modifier -22 optimization | Complex cases qualify for 20-30% increased reimbursement | Do you identify modifier -22 opportunities from operative reports? Do you prepare supporting cover letters? |
| Bilateral and laterality compliance | Nearly every orthopedic procedure requires laterality documentation | How do you enforce -RT/-LT on every applicable claim? How do you handle bilateral procedure billing per payer preference? |
| Spine coding expertise | Spine surgery involves multiple code families billed simultaneously | Do you have certified spine coders? How do you handle fusion + instrumentation + graft + device code combinations? |
At Medtransic, our orthopedic billing clients see clean claim rates above 96%, denial rates below 5%, and average days in AR under 28 days — results driven by our comprehensive revenue cycle management methodology. We assign certified orthopedic coders to every musculoskeletal practice, track global periods at the patient level, and review every operative report for complete charge capture — including modifier -22 opportunities, missed add-on codes, and implant pass-through eligibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is orthopedic billing and why is it different from general medical billing?
Orthopedic billing covers the coding and claims management for musculoskeletal services including joint replacements, arthroscopy, fracture care, spine surgery, injections, and DME. It differs from general medical billing primarily due to global surgical periods (90-day windows where post-operative care is bundled into the surgical fee), extensive modifier requirements (laterality, bilateral, multiple procedures), NCCI bundling edits on arthroscopic procedures, and workers compensation cases that operate under different fee schedules and authorization rules.
How much do orthopedic billing services cost?
Most orthopedic billing companies charge between 4% and 9% of collected revenue, with the percentage varying based on practice size, surgical volume, and service scope. Practices with high surgical volume and ASC billing may negotiate lower percentages due to higher per-claim reimbursement. Some companies charge flat per-claim fees. At Medtransic, we provide transparent pricing tailored to each orthopedic practice's specific volume and complexity profile.
What is a global period in orthopedic surgery billing?
A global period is the timeframe during which all routine pre-operative and post-operative care is bundled into the surgical payment. Major orthopedic surgeries (joint replacements, spinal fusions, ACL reconstructions) carry 90-day global periods covering one pre-op day plus 90 post-op days. Minor procedures carry 0-day or 10-day periods. Services within the global window are not separately billable unless they qualify as unrelated (modifier -24 or -79), unplanned returns to OR (modifier -78), or staged procedures (modifier -58).
What are the most common orthopedic billing errors?
The most common errors are billing services during the global period without the appropriate modifier, unbundling arthroscopic procedures that should be billed as a single code, missing laterality modifiers (-RT/-LT) on extremity procedures, selecting the wrong open vs. arthroscopic CPT code, using incorrect ICD-10 7th characters on fracture claims, and failing to bill implant pass-through codes in ASC settings. Each of these errors either causes denials or leaves revenue uncollected.
Can orthopedic practices bill for workers compensation cases differently?
Yes. Workers compensation cases operate under state-mandated fee schedules (often higher than commercial rates), require authorization through the employer's workers comp carrier or TPA rather than the insurance company, may require specific billing forms or additional CMS-1500 fields, and have different timely filing deadlines and appeal processes. Practices that bill workers comp using their standard commercial insurance workflow routinely under-collect and experience longer payment delays.
How should ultrasound-guided joint injections be billed?
Ultrasound-guided joint injections use code 20611 (major joint) instead of 20610 (unguided). The imaging guidance is bundled into 20611 — do NOT bill the ultrasound guidance code 76942 separately, as it will be denied. Reimbursement for 20611 is approximately 30-40% higher than 20610. Documentation must include evidence of ultrasound use and stored images. Practices with point-of-care ultrasound should ensure every guided injection is coded as 20611 to capture the full reimbursement.
What is modifier -22 and how does it apply to orthopedic surgery?
Modifier -22 indicates increased procedural services — the procedure was significantly more complex than typical. In orthopedic surgery, this applies to revision cases with extensive scar tissue, patients with morbid obesity requiring modified approaches, intraoperative complications managed successfully, or procedures with abnormal anatomy. When properly documented and submitted with a supporting cover letter, modifier -22 can increase reimbursement by 20-30%. It is widely under-utilized in orthopedic practices.
Should I outsource orthopedic billing or keep it in-house?
Outsourcing orthopedic billing to a specialized company is recommended for practices that lack certified orthopedic coders, experience denial rates above 5-8%, have days in AR exceeding 35 days, or do not have systems to track global periods and NCCI edits. The cost of outsourcing (typically 4-9% of collections) is often offset by increased collections from accurate coding, reduced denials, faster AR resolution, and identification of missed billing opportunities like modifier -22 and implant pass-through charges.
Stop Losing Revenue to Global Period Errors and Coding Gaps
Get a free billing audit to see how much revenue your orthopedic practice is leaving on the table from missed modifiers, unbundled arthroscopy codes, and implant pass-through opportunities.